This a response blog to a featured blog.
http://silentseekr.xanga.com/701516200/mr-president-dont-apologize-for-me/The author of the blog believes that President Obama was wrong to apologize to European leaders for American arrogance. If that was the case, then I could understand where the author was coming from. However there is more to the story.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5100338/Barack-Obama-arrogant-US-has-been-dismissive-to-allies.htmlThis story in The Telegraph, a UK newspapers, sheds some light onto the subject. While President Obama does offer an apology for past arrogance, he does bring up the condescending attitude many Europeans have toward America, ignoring the good the United States has done, and focusing on the bad.
I believe that the nation should take a more conciliatory approach to foreign policy. The previous administration's policy was very divisive and unnecessarily created conflict.
Would it be logical to support a nation that pre-emptively strikes another nation? Of course not, that seems idiotic. Why should we get carte blanche? Is it because we're the U.S. and we're supposedly so good? Well if that's the case, then who watches the watcher? Attacking Iraq without provocation sends the message that pre-emptive war is all right. That's why we really couldn't criticize the Russian invasion of Georgia last August.
The idea that apologizing makes one weak is laughable. It takes more courage to admit when you're wrong and risk losing face.
Being stubborn leads to things like Vietnam and our current situation between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers.
Although I have to think that a fair amount of this is being directed at the president due to the D by his name.
Chatboard (0)